I had a lot of fun with this reading. Once again I had the privilege of reading
words and ideas expressed by Deanna. I
find it always interesting when I am able to hear the voice of a teacher
through phrasing in text, as well as in the classroom. It also makes me think of a phrase from the
reading this week. “Perhaps the most important lesson we can take from
considering communication as a process is that we learn as we communicate, not
before we speak or write” (p. 15). This
is one reason that a blog is necessary.
We are learning as Deanna communicates to us, but we also learn as we
communicate back. Every time we write we
practice not only writing style and grammar, but also how we like to
communicate. Some people take a critical
paradigm style with the writing, while others focus on quantitative work, and
still others are able to express performativity even when written on
paper. The practice of writing helps us
to fully formulate an argument by working out the kinks.
The only problem with
this idea is that many of us edit as we write.
The book reminds us that editing along the way stifles the communicative
process that writing should provide. Do
not feel bad when this process becomes frustrating and feels like “extra work.” By writing a first draft, we allow the ideas
to surface before we begin selecting out the good from the not quite as
good. The idea of a crappy first draft
is hard to do with out planning ahead.
Time is important within the writing process, and lack of time is the
enemy of good writing. This is definitely
an idea that most college students are familiar with. Many grad students have admitted that the
writing process has involved many first and only drafts that have to be edited along the way to
account for procrastination. As a
result, writers need to work against this by writing early and often letting
the ideas become more important than editing.
And if you catch me still doing the first and only writing, remind
me of when I sang praises of multiple drafts!
Here is a video that I think makes a lot of sense when looking at it through the lens of Chapter 1. Specifically p. 7 and p. 15.
No comments:
Post a Comment